Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

In this example, independent hand calculation results of the internal force values ​​obtained as a result of the earthquake calculation with the mode shapes, periods and mode combination method of a two-storey system with a single span are made and the results of ideCAD Static Structural are compared. The damping ratio used in response spectrum analysis is taken into account as 5%. Full Quadratic Combination (TKB or CQC) has been used as the modal combination method . Independent hand calculation solutions of periods, horizontal displacements and bending moments calculated as a result of modal analysis were made according to Chopra 2012.

...

Info

Important Note: The masses are defined only on the beam members for ease of independent manual calculation.

Comparison of periods

Compared Value

ideCAD

Static

Structural

Manual solution

Percentage of error

1st Mode Period

1.562

1.562

0%

2nd Mode Period

0.5868

0.5868

0%

...

Comparison of response displacement results

Node and direction

ideCAD

Static

Structural

Manual solution

Percentage of error

3 DN (UX)

7.59

7.59

0%

1 DN (UX)

18.8

18.8

0%

...

Element end moments comparison (M 33 ) kip-ft

Workman

Node

ideCAD

Static

Structural

Manual solution

Percentage of error


S1

3

817.99

817.99

0%

4

817.99

817.99

0%


S2

one

433.81

433.81

0%

2nd

433.81

433.81

0%


C3

3

568.47

568.47

0%

5

1056.17

1056.17

0%


C5

one

433.81

433.81

0%

3

499.81

499.81

0%

...

Geometric Properties and System Description

...

Tip

T 1 = 1.562 s and T 2 = 0.5868 natural vibration periods results were found to be exactly the same with ideCAD StaticStructural.

...

After finding the mode shapes and natural vibration periods, the nodal deformation values ​​for each mode must be found.

...

To switch from the horizontal elastic design acceleration spectrum to the displacement spectrum, the following equation is used.

...

Information Annex Appendix-4A Detailed Explanation

Info

Note: In this example, no carrier system response coefficient will be used. Therefore, R yk , T) = 1 and µ k = 1 will be considered. However, in the Design Based on Strength (DOT) approach, the carrier system behavior coefficient is taken into account.

...

Tip

The values ​​of u 1st floor = 7.59 in and u 2nd floor = 18.8 are exactly the same as the results of ideCAD StaticStructural.

...

Under the influence of an earthquake (for the X direction) element internal forces can be obtained similarly. The building moment diagram can be drawn in the order described below.

...

Elements and end moments are given in the table below when Full Quadratic Joining (TKT or CQC) is applied.

Workman

Node

1.Mod Moment kip-ft

2.Mod Moment kip-ft

CQC result kip-ft


S1

3

  • 814

  • 57

817.99

4

  • 814

  • 57

817.99


S2

one

  • 396

179

433.81

2nd

  • 396

179

433.81


C3

3

425

374

568.47

5

968

412

1056.17


C5

one

396

  • 179

433.81

3

389

  • 317

499.81

Tip

Moment values ​​occurring in Ex loading are exactly the same with ideCAD Static Structural results.

...

Note

Important Note: Complete Quadratic Combination (CQC or TKT) or square of the total of the
square root of (KTKK and SRSS) rules is a method in which the loss of the concept direction as seen in the example above. For this reason, internal forces and deformations are expressed in absolute values ​​in the earthquake calculation made with the Mode Combination Method. The internal force diagrams drawn do not provide the equilibrium equation, they give the maximum internal force value that can occur due to all vibration modes of the relevant point under the effect of an earthquake.

...